Village blacksmiths and steamboat captains are no longer in high demand. Technology calls for new job skills and renders others obsolete. My first freelance editing contract applied a skill that’s fast going the way of long division: editing for fit.
Once upon a time, not so terribly long ago, physical multi-volume encyclopedias were typeset without benefit of computer. The cost of revision went up with each page that needed to be re-set. When a noteworthy event necessitated updating a page, editors tried to leave the surrounding pages untouched to limit cost. Any change on page 197 had to be offset by other adjustments for the text to flow smoothly between the existing pages 196 and 198. A sheet of clear plastic, marked off in lines and columns, lay over the galley proof of the page under revision. Did a column run too long? What about widows and orphans, those pesky solitary lines at the top or bottom of a column, cut off from the rest of the paragraph? Did the closing sentence break at the same place as before? Fitting each page was a puzzle to solve by such tricks as substituting synonyms or shifting paragraph breaks. Apart from physical newspapers and magazines, there’s not much call for this editing skill any more. But it holds an analogy with daily life. How can I schedule to begin and end my day at the desired time and place, with the right amount of activity between? Can I combine errands or split up social events, or swap activities of different length between one day and the next? Each 24-hour day is like a printed column with a fixed number of lines, a puzzle to edit for fit.
13 Comments
Lisa
12/5/2016 10:06:48 am
My life is still all about copy fitting (not the editing of the words, but the positioning of the words). Printers don't keep the old films or plates any more, and the cost of a reprint includes new ones, so repagination rarely matters. Design and printing has undergone a true revolution since I began doing this work 25 years ago.
Reply
Lisa, copy fitting sounds very related and complementary to editing for fit. When I did the historical society newsletter, I mostly fit by edits but occasionally changed fonts or the spacing between paragraphs to even out the columns.
Reply
Lisa
12/5/2016 12:47:50 pm
Well, Sarah, that answer could be extensive. I'll name a few.
Reply
Lisa
12/5/2016 12:52:17 pm
So, to bring this back to your post and stay on topic, ...
Rhonda Peterson
12/5/2016 11:44:59 pm
A form of editing for fit that still happens is with the client who says, "I want a public information piece that makes the following 10 detailed points . . . and oh, by he way, it has to fit on one page and have some photos or graphics to make it interesting."
Reply
Rhonda Peterson
12/5/2016 11:47:50 pm
On your main point, I'm not sure I have a "desired" point to start and end my day. Those points seem more a matter of what's required of me than what I desire -- at least, s=during the work week!
Reply
Lisa
12/6/2016 08:53:09 am
"LIKE" and "LIKE"
Lisa
12/7/2016 09:06:22 am
Sarah, IMHO, as a reader, the concept of "rambling" in a book-length piece vs an article are two very different things. Do consider the topics you didn't ramble on about. The reader may wish you had rambled a bit more, here and there — perhaps even at the expense of one of the other nine topics that "had" to be covered. Rambling has a rhythm of its own. Signed, your careful reader friend. Lisa, point well made about rambling. There are not only different kinds of writing, there are different kinds of rambling. A leisurely ramble through a meadow can be delightful when it allows for noticing the purple wildflowers, the bird calls, the grasses waving in the breeze. Not so much when it's a matter of excess verbiage and repetition without fresh content.
Reply
Lisa
12/7/2016 09:57:57 am
And yet, the writer can sometimes be so close to the material that what they perceive as "rambling," the reader may need. I'm constantly amazed at what my readers/listeners don't know ... "naturalization," "steerage"... And I am always grateful when the writer has provided JUST the right amount of information... to the careful — meaning "interested" or "engrossed" — reader. Just read a book for book discussion, where there was not a SINGLE extra word. Nor was there a word missing. Such a joy to keep turning the pages. You never know what's going to be just beyond the next black-eyed Susan, and perhaps it's just another black-eyed Susan but this time next to a sedum instead of a native grass, and maybe that one will blink in the reader's/viewer's brain as that bit of insight they needed to "get it," whatever "it" is to them.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI'm a historian who writes novels and literary nonfiction. My home base is Madison, Wisconsin.
|