Sarah Gibbard Cook
  • Home
  • About
  • Writing
  • Contact

“I Did My Research”

7/26/2021

6 Comments

 
Picture
Misinformation abounds. I haven’t actually heard “I did my research” to defend weak claims, but I’ve read rebuttals: “Searching websites isn’t research. You didn’t use a control group, or do statistical analysis, or apply the scientific method.”

Rubbish. Historical research rarely involves any of the above. Many materials once found only in libraries are available online. What is research, anyway? What do a fourth-grader’s report, a high school term paper, and a grant-funded scholarly investigation have in common?
  1. Research is a proactive quest to find out. Happening onto an interesting fact isn’t enough. The researcher starts with a question, chases down relevant evidence, and follows wherever it leads.
  2. Research involves systematic processing. For a research report on the dodo or Harriet Tubman, a schoolchild finds and synthesizes information from multiple sources. Market researchers don’t just interview but analyze the data they collect.
  3. Research produces new knowledge. You may anticipate a particular result—that’s called a hypothesis—but you can’t know until your research confirms it. High school chemistry “experiments” to demonstrate a predictable outcome don’t count.
True research can be valid or invalid, based on sound or unreliable sources, using appropriate or faulty process. Criteria vary by level and field. Grounded in curiosity, it’s all research.
6 Comments
Dennis Doren
7/26/2021 08:02:38 am

I find the question “how do we know what we know” to be so fundamental that the vast majority of us rarely ask this of ourselves. By our having done “research” is one possible answer but as you point out, that answer can mean a lot of things. I have to disagree with seeing all of your listed methods of “research” as or equal veracity/utility, though. For many people under many circumstances, “research” involves asking their friends and family what they think, or going to the same media source over and over. Synthesizing the information from even “multiple sources” of this type rarely involves exposing oneself to information contrary to the inherent selection bias of friends and family and our media choice; despite also being a “proactive quest” and resulting in new knowledge. The process of selection bias in our chosen sources of information has, in my view, become a significant problem in our country - often encapsulated in the phrase “FOX versus CNN”. No matter how many sources a proactive “researcher” consults, if they are all selected with the same bias (which is what humans tend to do, on either side of the political spectrum), this constitutes what is called “confirmation bias” - “proving” what you already think you know by selecting only sources of information you have reason will give you that confirmation. This, to me, is not research, but regularly is described even to ourselves as such. Research, to me, is not a proper label for the process of seeking only information with which we are psychologically comfortable.

Reply
Sarah Cook link
7/26/2021 10:45:16 am

Dennis, I totally agree about the dangers of selection bias - not only to our findings but to our public life. I have this (perhaps romanticized) image that when everyone watched Walter Cronkite, before we had such a wide range of sources to choose from, we were less polarized even though we didn't all agree.

That's why genuine curiosity is so essential a part of the process. Of course this reflects my personal bias, since curiosity is one of the two or three top motivators for practically everything I do. Trying to find out is different from trying to find support for what we think we already know - which, to me, doesn't count. In scientific or academic research, established criteria provide some degree of safeguards. The rest of us need to monitor ourselves, to follow the evidence wherever it takes us, and to look for evidence in unexpected places.

As for the fourth grade research report, when I did mine on the dodo, my only preconceptions were that it was interesting and extinct. Assigned to research and write about an animal, I feared the abundance of sources on horse or dog or cat would overwhelm me. So I picked one I'd never heard of before reading Alice in Wonderland.

Reply
Christine DeSmet link
7/26/2021 09:30:45 am

Dennis has a good addition to what you've begun, Sarah. Thanks to you both. I agree with Dennis that many people don't really know what "research" means. Research is a tough task and calls for digging deep and often being wrong (at first) because of the facts we find. But research is always fun because there's this exhilarating effect in the end that says "we did it." We spent the time. We spent the energy and courted being wrong in our first assumption or even our tenth assumption. This relentless research is what true creativity is all about. We explore and being wrong or finding out something we didn't expect is so valid and wonderful. Nice post, Sarah! Our better sleuths in our fiction are sometimes researchers, but most are just trying to validate their assumptions. That's something to think about, too, as we write and read.

Reply
Sarah Cook link
7/26/2021 11:04:59 am

Christine, yes, research is tough and fun for all the reasons you say. On hearing I was writing historical fiction, occasionally a writer in another genre would say, "But you have to do so much research." I would beam and say, "Yes! Isn't it wonderful?"

I appreciate your making the connection between relentless research and creativity. I've wondered how exploration and discovery (including but not limited to research) relate to the creative process, since they feel to me like part of the same thing.

And the exhilaration of finding we've been totally wrong! Walking an unfamiliar forest trail, I laugh out loud when it brings me out somewhere totally different from where I thought I was. That is so much of the fun.

As for our sleuths, interesting point: thinking back over the last few mysteries I read, yes, after the opening chapters they were trying to validate their hunches, either with success (like the Nancy Drew I just finished) or with an unsought surprise revealing the true solution. They may get joy out of proactively disproving someone else's assumptions, but rarely their own.

Reply
Rebecca Cuningham link
7/26/2021 11:11:52 am

Nice conversation you've started, Sarah. I think research is different for biologists versus historians for example. Perhaps we need separate words for the process. In Spanish, the word for research is investigar, which describes it well for me. I love to investigate a new subject and get immersed in it. That is what I love to write about on my website.

Reply
Sarah Cook link
7/27/2021 07:58:50 am

I like thinking of it as investigation. (Aren't cognates wonderful?) The downside of separate words for biological vs historical research is that we would probably need a hundred words - what astronomers do is different from epidemiologists from linguists from . . . But investigation fits it all, a systematic quest to find out.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    I'm a historian who writes novels and literary nonfiction. My home base is Madison, Wisconsin. 

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016

    RSS Feed


      ​get updates

    Sign up
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • About
  • Writing
  • Contact