Sarah Gibbard Cook
  • Home
  • About
  • Writing
  • Contact

Law and Order, an American Heritage

9/7/2020

7 Comments

 
​In the Boston Tea Party of 1773, a rowdy mob of American colonists dumped a shipload of tea into the harbor to protest a new tax. Unruly demand for change is a deep-rooted American tradition. So is the call for “law and order” to defend the status quo.

Against wider suffrage. In Rhode Island in the 1840s, armed protesters demanded voting rights for all white men regardless of wealth. Opponents formed a Law and Order Party to preserve the old colonial charter, which allowed only men of property to vote.

Against abolition. “Bleeding Kansas” in the 1850s was awash in violence between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions. A pro-slavery Law and Order Party accused its opponents of criminal fanaticism and met bloodshed with bloodshed.

Against alcohol. In the later 1800s and early 1900s, temperance sentiment was strongest among Protestants of English descent. Disdainful of beer-drinking Irish and German Catholic immigrants, they formed local Law and Order Leagues to enforce anti-liquor ordinances.

In each case, law and order won out in the short run. The expanded-suffrage leader in Rhode Island was sentenced to life in prison. Questioning the legality of slavery in Kansas could bring five years imprisonment. The 18th Amendment made Prohibition federal law. In the longer run, social change proved beyond the power of law and order to prevent.
7 Comments
Matt
9/7/2020 10:44:55 am

Thank you for a very nice perspective of how the long arc bends towards justice.

While the modern Tea Party people dive into details (like a "circle the differences" puzzle) of differences between then and now (for example https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/505849-the-myth-of-the-boston-tea-party ), your short perspective rings much simpler and wiser.

Reply
Sarah Cook link
9/7/2020 04:01:50 pm

Matt, glad you find it so. History never repeats itself in its entirety, and broad patterns recur all the time. To me, whether a comparison is helpful depends on whether the point it's trying to make holds up. Mine that "law and order" has been a call to resist societal change holds up despite differences between the two tea parties (the Boston protesters resented the change that gave the colonies less autonomy than they were used to). Had I used the argument primarily to argue that protests should always include burning down storefronts and maximum generalized property damage, the; contrast between tea parties would be relevant.

Reply
Sarah Cook link
9/8/2020 07:14:50 am

Presumably the modern Tea Party embraced that name to align itself with the American tradition of protest. The rowdy wing of that tradition includes the protest in Charlottesville (where one counter-protester was killed) and those protesting the COVID restrictions. But I don't hear "law and order" invoked against them.

Beth
9/7/2020 01:48:39 pm

Good examples -- As I know you know, you can find them in England too. I'd be interested in a look at your perspective on that.

Matt -- what is the "circle of differences"?

Reply
Sarah Cook link
9/7/2020 04:14:15 pm

Thanks, Beth. I'm well aware for protests and suppression in England - I didn't look into whether the exact phrase "law and order" is of long standing there. Would be interesting to know. Do you have particular examples in mind?

I hadn't heard of the circle of differences either. Found a description of a diversity game online but can't locate it now.

Reply
Matt
9/9/2020 11:05:58 am

By a "circle the differences" puzzle, I meant this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spot_the_difference

(I call it "circle the differences" because (1) there are usually multiple differences, and (2) it is common to circle the differences after you spot them. Also, solutions are shown with the differences circled.)

Reply
Sarah Cook link
9/10/2020 07:09:53 am

Thanks, Matt. I remember children's pictures and also photographs that are identical in all but one way, the puzzle being to find it. In real life, there are always (I suspect) multiple differences. And often bias in which ones we see.




Leave a Reply.

    Author

    I'm a historian who writes novels and literary nonfiction. My home base is Madison, Wisconsin. 

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016

    RSS Feed


      ​get updates

    Sign up
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • About
  • Writing
  • Contact